peter236

is there anything wrong with ignoring your posts?
people just want to avoid wasting time with you
嘉嘉 發表於 2009-9-24 23:35

I didn't say he ignored my posts. Lik would reply to my posts, but then he ignored my arguments when I rebuked him. This is his way of evasion. Please upgrade your reading ability.

peter236

你真係無論中文定英文o既理解能力都有問題喎.....

請問我邊一句句子話過你係大陸o黎？
唔該一隻一隻字睇清楚，唔好懶醒叻唔切make any assumption, please


嘉嘉 發表於 2009-9-24 23:32

Oh you said "好明顯佢一定係大陸失敗教育o既受害者啦". Okay if I misinterpreted you then myversa also misinterpret you.
Maybe you yourself is a victim of failure of the Canadian education system.

peter236

Highspeed rail in Tianjing

Catpiano

N E X T !!!

Lik

When Lik makes his false claims, I then rebuked him with facts. Very often he just pretends he didn't see my points and then he would repeat his points again in the reply. That is his way of evasion.
peter236 發表於 2009-9-24 23:22

笑咗～

對啲五毛仔來講，阿爺講嘅說話咪係金科玉律囉。你可以繼續叫呢啲做 fact，但我只會當佢地係狗屁不如嘅廢話。

好多時其他網友已經道破咗你啲廢話，咁我又使乜再講咁多？

-力

peter236

笑咗～

對啲五毛仔來講，阿爺講嘅說話咪係金科玉律囉。你可以繼續叫呢啲做 fact，但我只會當佢地係狗屁不如嘅廢話。

好多時其他網友已經道破咗你啲廢話，咁我又使乜再講咁多？

-力 ...
Lik 發表於 2009-9-25 10:19

wahahaha, another baseless claim from you. All these facts are not from your so-called 阿爺. These are publicly available information. You claim that highspeed railway are not needed but in fact the demand is very high in China, Europe and Japan. The railway stations in China are crowded. Of course you don't know since you have never been to China.

You claimed that North America does not need highpeed railway, but President Obama and the Americans are doing some planning. You claimed that maglev in China is not useful when you have never been to China, and also the Japanese are planning their Chuo shinkansen as a maglev line.

I am just posting photos in this thread, if you don't like it, you need not reply.

Lik

It never fails to amaze me how hard 50 cents idiots try to distort the facts, even when they are in plain sight:

It is pointless to compare methods of travel between North America and China. With its sparse population density and vast expanses of land, it is illogical for many places in NA to invest in mass transit infrastructure in the same way China does. In China where the population density is high, however, trains as a form of mass transit make a lot of sense.

The problem is, I can't help but wonder whether a lot of these are simply 面子工程 or not. The Maglev train in Shanghai is a prime example of 面子工程 because the track spans a mere 30km and has been a complete commercial failure. People rarely use it, so the train is operating nowhere close to its carrying capacity. And while it can reach over 500km/h, the track is so short that the moment it approaches its maximum speeds, it really had to start decelerating again.

China has indeed been expanding its mass transit systems (train) for the past few years, and in the wake of the global recession, the government has accelerated a lot of the projects to both re-employ hundreds of thousands of laid off workers and stabilize the economy. By and large, those are some very good deeds, but the 面子工程 aspect of the construction cannot be ignored. Unfortunately, the only thing ignorant idiots know and go around boasting about are those very same 面子工程...
Lik 發表於 2009-9-22 09:51

Remember the time when you said I supported the HST, and how I quote my complain letter to Gordie and Hansen?

So who is the idiot here?

-Lik

peter236

It never fails to amaze me how hard 50 cents idiots try to distort the facts, even when they are in plain sight:


Remember the time when you said I supported the HST, and how I quote my complain lett ...
Lik 發表於 2009-9-25 10:52

Of course you are the idiot here. I can't believe you reposted your previous post in which you clearly said the "面子工程 aspect cannot be ignored". Clearly, these highpseed railway are necessary for the hundreds of millions of people in China, so there is no such thing as "面子工程 aspect".

peter236

It never fails to amaze me how hard 50 cents idiots try to distort the facts, even when they are in plain sight:


Remember the time when you said I supported the HST, and how I quote my complain lett ...
Lik 發表於 2009-9-25 10:52

Of course you are the idiot here. I can't believe you reposted your previous post in which you clearly said the "面子工程 aspect cannot be ignored". Clearly, these highpseed railway are necessary for the hundreds of millions of people in China, so there is no such thing as "面子工程 aspect".

zoids

Hahaha, you mad.

you all mad.

LOL.

/me go grab some popcorn.