返回列表 發帖
莊香。
S Internatsionalom
Vospryanet rod lyudskoy!

TOP

HK government is very messy now.  If you are head of the government, you will get yelled at for:
1.  Do not do anything.
2.  Do something to satisfy some group of people.
3.  Do something to satisfy the other group of people.
4.  Spend money to help citizen.
5.  Don't spend money to help citizen.

People in HK nowadays like to yell.  Most people don't even know what they are yelling for.  They just want to yell to testify the freedom of speech.  I am not saying all the yell are baseless, but there are many many idiots just want to create trouble.

BC government is very crappy as well.  Maybe we need the type of people in HK to come BC to yell at Campbell.

TOP

烏呼矣哉
又一証明,立法會可以執凹
ricrick 發表於 2010-1-16 19:53

我會咁話,唔係立法會要執笠,而係功能組別一定要執笠。而我相信,經過今次高鐵呢一役之後,全香港嘅所有人都上咗一堂寶貴嘅公民教育課。

但予此同時,我亦發覺特衰政府同班保皇犬比以前變得更醜陋同更肆無忌憚。上次皇后碼頭都唔會咁明目張膽咁去公然反民意,而 23條果陣就更加要就範於民意之下。而且動用到防暴警察同 pepper spray 來對付香港群眾就好似更加係第一次。事情令到我唔可以唔覺得特衰政府向獨裁管治邁進咗一大步,而差人更徹頭徹尾地變成民意嘅打壓工具。

-力

TOP

本帖最後由 sheep 於 2010-1-16 23:05 編輯

對於異見人士
打壓 力要重 手要硬
絕對不能手軟
呢個 係中央嘅命令
你聽誤聽倒?

TOP

So .. it doesn't matter who is right .. and how many citizen ..  

GREAT CHINA ( and PEE   TEE  R ) is always right ...

TOP

而且動用到防暴警察同 pepper spray 來對付香港群眾就好似更加係第一次。


你不仁我不義
成幾百人係咁衝擊圍欄
唔出坦克已經便宜左佢地

TOP

上次皇后碼頭都唔會咁明目張膽咁去公然反民意


邊個說話代表民意
好多人反既同時亦有好多人支持
如果唔起又係唔係漠視支持果班人既民意

TOP

People in HK nowadays like to yell.  Most people don't even know what they are yelling for.  They just want to yell to testify the freedom of speech.  I am not saying all the yell are baseless, but there are many many idiots just want to create trouble.


示威就好似毒品咁
個個friend都去遊行
你唔去咪唔合群
俾人孤立你

TOP

吃晚飯之際,原來電視直播立法會財務委員會辯論高鐵撥款,泛民大打拉布,問完又問,沒完沒了,自不然搞到夠晒鐘。用咁嘅方法,財委會都唔知開會開到幾時先至可以就撥款投票。馬主 H與一班馬主都係支持派,認為興建高鐵合乎香港長遠整體利益,碰啱馬主 M亦係工程師學會會員,馬主 M全面贊同香港工程師學會之高鐵專責小組之觀點,認為公共專業聯盟提出之錦上路方案內容甚多工程技術考慮不足之處,並不可行。而佢哋對「錦上路方案」造價可以慳好多之說,一致認為不可接受,質疑公盟可能估價不足。此乃工程師學會之整體意見,如果有人話唔信工程師學會嘅專業意見,而相信一班為咗一個目的而臨時召集走埋一齊之人,無話可說。
眾位馬主之中,有商人、有旅行社東主、有律師、有出版界高人、有工程師,眾人(不代表馬主協會)一致支持高鐵,用潮流術語講,使唔使申報利益呀?出版界高人講:「總之公開自己之職業就得啦,譬如講西九文化區,高志森企硬支持,當然係代表佢自己業界利益,唔通你唔畀高志森在西九發展發表意見咩。譬如工程師學會,支持興建高鐵,佢哋認為工程技術可行,你都唔能夠抹殺佢哋意見嘅啫。電影界得到政府支援,成立一億元電影基金,你話啲導演、演員唔去支持爭取咩。」
香港政界有個清潔癖,洗白白要白過白色,在中國最崇拜之美國,夠晒民主喇啩?工會代表為咗醫療改革法案直情入白宮見奧巴馬爭取利益,工會以前又捐過好多好多錢畀奧巴馬競選總統,佢哋究竟有冇利益衝突?現實政治就是如此,奧巴馬競選之時,成日講改革( change),充滿理想,到入主白宮之後,做事作風與以前白宮主人毫無分別!在高鐵問題上,所有香港人都係持份者,人人可以發言,不能話邊個有利益衝突就因人廢言。

    *

      (左丁山)

TOP

he's much fairer much cheung mo kei,  both are from appledaily, or used to be, who said the other day that every supporter of the system, or for that matter, everyone who support the govt. is from the left, all communist, sometimes i just hate him commentating like that, so bias,  may be that's why he lost his morning show!!!

TOP

返回列表