78#shutterbug
If you take the ideology from policyalternatives serious, you must be either a person with heart of gold or insane. They are simply the counterpart of Fraser Institute which you should not trust either.
A simple math for you, if you take 50% away from the 16% workers earning less than $10 per hour(I assume they are the foodservers who would make more than you and me combined), and 5% as interns and school kids making spending money, then only 3% of working people actually fall in the bracket. It is not fair but not the worst situation.
I don't know what kind of group policyalternatives is, I just found the article and it seems to be giving out the stats. Of course I can't verify their stats. Whether I'm insane or not, it doesn't really matter cuz someone will think I am and someone will think I ain't. However, it's always better to look at things from other angles, good or bad.
Since I don't know about that group, can you tell me why you think they're so bad?
I don't know what kind of group policyalternatives is, I just found the article and it seems to be giving out the stats. Of course I can't verify their stats. Whether I'm insane or not, it doesn't r ...
shutterbug 發表於 2009-5-14 18:37
They do research and studies for the leftist politicians with a fee, same as the Fraser Institute do for conservative politicans. Joy McPhail studied economy at Economy Institute in London , which made her a great Minister of Finance for Glen Clark.
You can use their stat and info for reference, but it is an expensive prescription
for our government
發表於 2009-5-14 18:28
| 
