返回列表 發帖

響公眾地方拍下人家的行為放上 YOUTUBE 是對的

結束時間: 2009-3-12 20:45 ,裁判: Littleprince

請大家多加利用這資源

[ 本帖最後由 Littleprince 於 2009-3-5 22:46 編輯 ]
正方

響公眾地方拍下人家的行為放上 YOUTUBE 是對的

反方

響公眾地方拍下人家的行為放上 YOUTUBE 是錯的

我好惹火。。。

按立場篩選:


視乎情況

若只是私人的事﹐例如情侶打K輪﹐呢D拍下放 YOUTUBE 就好缺德。。。
但若是目擊交通意外或是有人偷竊﹐拍下作為證據﹐就很應該。。。

可是大多數情況之下未得當事人同意公開人家的片段都係好缺德。。。

大家話呢﹖

[ 本帖最後由 Littleprince 於 2009-3-5 22:49 編輯 ]
我好惹火。。。

TOP

若只是私人的事﹐例如情侶打K輪﹐呢D拍下放 YOUTUBE 就好缺德。。

Yes. No matter for personal collection or post on youtube la.

但若是目擊交通意外或是有人偷竊﹐拍下作為證據﹐就很應該。。。

Also agree. But if this kind of evidence didn't hand over to related officials but instead still keeping it for personal collection or post on youtube, still no good.

I assume you're talking about most general cases, so I voted "wrong".

TOP

公眾地方冇隱
唔好偷拍 要明正言順去做

[ 本帖最後由 sheep 於 2009-3-5 23:13 編輯 ]

TOP

正所謂"屁乃肚中氣﹐邊個叫你貪心索入鼻"。我覺得D人不停留意身邊有咩好影之後放上網好無聊同好侵犯人肖像權囉。唔好話咩啦﹐我自己無facebook,我都好介意有D朋友將我嘅合照放上網架﹗


-- 城中名人大C姐

TOP

I don't think it's the act of recording that's the problem. It's more like the intention and purpose of recording that's important.

If the intention is for constructive reasons, whether if it's constructive to you personally (evidence during car accident), or constructive for the public (taser incident), I think that's fine.

However if the intention is just to laugh at others' mistake, to expose other people's secret, but it nets no greater good for society other than making the subject embarrased and a good laugh for the internet users, it's sad and it's horrible. A good example would be the "Star Wars Kid's video" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars_Kid).

Even worse, as just some odd internet citizen, do we really have the right to criticize others merely based on a video? There are plenty of prior incidents,  notably and easily recalled would be "巴士阿叔事件" and "韓國狗屎女". I am not that good in wording things, so instead I'll quote 2 blog commentaries to try to get my points across:

1. (From "巴士判官vs網上判官": http://mrjimtong.mysinablog.com/index.php?op=ViewArticle&articleId=169033)
"網上審判與一般現實生活中的批評有其不同之處。

一) 通常我們是透過短片去知悉某事。既然是短片,就有以偏蓋全的危險。我們只見事件片段,究竟前因如何,怎發展到這個地步?因為不是一窺全豹,所以結論會有所偏頗,對當事人不公平。

二) 當我們批判時,當事人並不在場,毫無辯解的機會,這是另一個不公平。

三) 批評者是網民,全是匿名的,所以在落結論時,或多或少較為輕率,反正不需負上任何言論責任。試想若我們是以真身說話,會如此「去盡」、輕鬆和快捷嗎?

話雖如此,不代表我不去批評網上所見的事,也不代表我會比較中肯去立論。因為,我也是凡人,也會(情不自禁地)利用網上那種匿名和便捷的性質。所以,我仍會是一個「網上判官」,只不過當批評別人時,多提醒自己,多從「巴士判官」的感受去看,也許得出的結論會較為持平和穩妥。"

2. (From "網絡維權 vs 網絡侵權": http://www.xanga.com/Kursk/486216755/item/)
"所謂「狗屎女事件」,其實是一年前一個南韓女子的愛犬在地鐵方便,有人拿出紙巾要求她清理,但她不肯,有人當場拍下照片,在網上公開。相片一公開,引起南韓網民公憤,聲討她的文字、設計圖片一發不可收拾,很快便有人認出她,於是公開了她唸的大學名稱和其他私人資料。最後,她在「大眾」壓力下退學。這事件在南韓和美國的blog界引起不少討論,有論者認為網民對她的公審,已超過她應得的教訓,也有人認為網絡出現令社會再度進入獵巫的時代."

[ 本帖最後由 BiscottiGelato 於 2009-3-5 23:23 編輯 ]

TOP

原帖由 BiscottiGelato 於 2009-3-6 00:21 發表
I don't think it's the act of recording that's the problem. It's more like the intention and purpose of recording that's important.

If the intention is for constructive reasons, whether if it's const ...


I totally agree with you.
In public area, everything we do affect the public, so we should behave responsibly.

TOP

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

TOP

毅字兄,
呢個問題想問你好耐, 德字兄同孝字兄同你有無親屬關係?

TOP

原帖由 毅字 於 2009-3-6 05:29 發表
響公眾地方拍下人家的行為放上 YOUTUBE 是錯的

甘你做咩選 “中立”窩。。。
我好惹火。。。

TOP

返回列表