返回列表 發帖

CPA 唔好亂做

亂急救奪命 家屬可索償

【明報專訊】一群無中醫牌照亦未經專業急救訓練的熱心波友,向懷疑心臟病發昏厥的傷者施以按穴急救及心外壓,最後事主保住性命,算是有個好結局。然而,若事主不幸死亡,「無牌」施救者是否須負刑責?大律師陸偉雄指出,「因為有關行為只為救人,沒犯罪意圖,故不涉謀殺或誤殺,一般毋須負刑責。」

沒犯罪意圖 毋須負刑責

陸表示,若事主由無專業資格者急救後死亡,死者家屬有可能以對方涉嫌疏忽為由,循民事入稟索償。他解釋,沒有專業資格者,其中一個責任是不應胡亂施救,否則即屬疏忽,「為事主解開衫鈕等當然不計,但若運用專業的急救法如心外壓和人工呼吸等,便屬不恰當」。

陸補充,能否成功追討要視乎驗屍結果,若死因屬心臟毛病,急救方式非直接令對方死亡,施救者沒任何責任;若死者因被按壓致肋骨折斷,刺穿肺部而亡,家屬有可能追究。「不過,如施救者以按穴的方法急救,則較難驗證死因是否與此有關」,但他坦言,鮮有家屬會向好心施救的市民索償。

所以羊羊你要記得CPA 唔好胡亂同任何人做呀!!

TOP

In Canada, we have the "Good Samaritan law" that protects us from such liabilities. However, I would be more careful down in the States as I know a certified first aid responder got herself sued by some stupid US mall for providing first aid to a person in need at the at the shopping mall parking lot.

-Lik

TOP

美國同中國一樣
好事莫做

TOP

就算比人告都要試下救啦, 人命關天啊!
祝大家永遠快樂! ^^

TOP

"""In Canada, we have the "Good Samaritan law" that protects us from such liabilities. """

are you sure about that?  i remember when i took the cpr course few years ago, the guy from st. john said " by law, you are not allow to give cpr treatment if you don't have any official cpr training".

TOP

佢學CPA梗係救死人,因為佢學錯野,救人係要學CPR

TOP

我有CPA證書,但系未到危機關頭,都唔會亂出手。

TOP

7# siumaibb


hahhaaa.... I was thinking the same thing too... CPA is Canadian Physiotherapy Association, so I guess if someone twisted their ankle 扭傷 and you don't have CPA, but you help them and they died...

TOP

CPR OK
咁都回錯
Thank you

TOP

返回列表