原帖由 bbqfish 於 2008-4-29 14:36 發表
can someone explain why Stanley Ho had to meet with 政務司司長 before buying Oasis?? Isn't this a purely business matter that has nth to do with gov???
原帖由 Ken 於 2008-4-29 14:24 發表
畢馬威在答覆查詢時則稱,外間有不少傳言,現階段沒有任何資料可提供,在適當時候會向外交代。運輸及房屋局發言人則表示,現階段任何收購行動,都由有意收購者與臨時清盤人洽商,毋須向政府呈報。
原帖由 bbqfish 於 2008-4-29 14:36 發表
can someone explain why Stanley Ho had to meet with 政務司司長 before buying Oasis?? Isn't this a purely business matter that has nth to do with gov???
Because afterall it involves 航空牌照 or whatever it's called? For example, government wouldn't want to a terrorist to buy an airline company right? Just my guess though
原帖由 Ultraman 於 2008-4-29 14:42 發表
Oh, since we have "gambling boat", could that be possible to be "gambling flight"?? All customers can have $500 泥碼 on flight! Haha....
Haha, great idea. but what if ur 泥碼 fly from "big" to "small" when there's turbulence?