返回列表 發帖
原帖由 mcjohnjohn 於 2009-1-8 01:17 發表


Ultraman, 既然你可以將吸毒及殺人同打麻雀及買六合彩比較, 小弟唯有甘拜下風...
閣下武功非凡, 小弟輸得心願誠服, 請呀! (閃~)

Many Christians (including general believers, pastors) say and believe bible has all kinds of examples that also work in nowadays daily life, since bible is  not a history book but it has no time limit at all, that mean bible won't be out-dated. I quoted those examples which are very common and valid in nowadays daily life. I'm not surprise if you don't know the answer and what things God would appreciate and what not if you don't know your God and bible well enough.

TOP

原帖由 mcjohnjohn 於 2009-1-8 01:21 發表


你邊忽見到我proud 呀? hoho...
點解聖經咁厚? 我都想知, 我都想佢簿少少, 讀書時候既帶聖經上堂, 真係好重架.

So, you somehow agree the rest of the pages are nonsense and garbage? But I don't agree wor.

TOP

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-1-8 18:57 發表

So, you somehow agree the rest of the pages are nonsense and garbage? But I don't agree wor.


你成日都胡亂猜測小弟既諗法, 但偏偏你次次都估錯, 真係^o^哂嘴.

[ 本帖最後由 mcjohnjohn 於 2009-1-8 20:25 編輯 ]

TOP

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-1-8 18:56 發表

Many Christians (including general believers, pastors) say and believe bible has all kinds of examples that also work in nowadays daily life, since bible is  not a history book but it has no time lim ...


你話點就點啦, 真係冇你咁好氣~

TOP

原帖由 mcjohnjohn 於 2009-1-8 04:23 發表


你成日都胡亂猜測小弟既諗法, 但偏偏你次次都估錯, 真係^o^哂嘴.

You think you only need to follow the major two rules and ignore all the rest, how would they be meaningful to you? You can clarify it if you like.

TOP

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-1-8 22:09 發表

You think you only need to follow the major two rules and ignore all the rest, how would they be meaningful to you? You can clarify it if you like.


Ultraman, 我唔clarify lu, 盞徙氣. 嘻嘻~
Just want to point out that you always says rule, rule and rule.
I really don't think there is any rule. For me, 愛天主 & 愛人如己 is not a rule, it is my life. If I want to follow rules, it is better to join 紀律部隊 or 制服團隊.

All I said was my POV only, please don't put my standard to other Christians, thank you very much.

TOP

原帖由 mcjohnjohn 於 2009-1-8 02:25 發表


如果冇記錯, 係神父同我講耶穌降生, 廢除左舊約既種種戒條, 重新同人與人之神建立新盟約.
新盟約就係愛天主, 同愛人如己.

拿, 我講到明唔知自己有冇記錯架. ...

Maybe I think you don't remember correctly...

『莫想我來要廢掉律法和先知。我來不是要廢掉,乃是要成全。我實在告訴你們,就是到天地都廢去了,律法的一點一畫也不能廢去,都要成全』(太5:17-18)

成全 = fulfil

TOP

原帖由 BiscottiGelato 於 2009-1-8 01:14 發表


Why can't I demand an apology if I feel offended? It's up to your own perception and moral standard, perhaps things like arrogance might influence your judgement as to whether you want to give that  ...

If you really feel really unhappy, you have my apology, just because I don't want you to feel unhappy.

I need to reiterate that I did not make false claims as example nor make fun of your parents at all!  You can certainly switch the example so it is between me and my parents.  I don't mind.  An example/analogy is just an example/analogy, doesn't have to be real life, the intention is to reinforce a claim, and I did not claim you're not your parents' son at all.  If by giving a valid example hurt your feelings, I don't know how to debate on anything with you.

It's nothing my arrogance, my conduct or my Christian belief, it's about reasoning and fairness.

If I have to apologize, the first one is to Nam, not you, because I was confused and thought that she was a believer and evaluated her comments based on that.

[ 本帖最後由 shutterbug 於 2009-1-8 10:01 編輯 ]

TOP

原帖由 shutterbug 於 2009-1-8 09:36 發表

Maybe I think you don't remember correctly...

『莫想我來要廢掉律法和先知。我來不是要廢掉,乃是要成全。我實在告訴你們,就是到天地都廢去了,律法的一點一畫也不能廢去,都要成全』(太5:17-18)

成全 = fulfil ...


So that include the rules that if a woman sleep with a man before getting married, she should be 被群眾以石頭打死?

TOP

原帖由 chunsh 於 2009-1-8 10:03 發表


So that include the rules that if a woman sleep with a man before getting married, she should be 被群眾以石頭打死?

Do you remember what Jesus did to the woman who commited adultery when people tried to kill her by throwing her stones?  You do your research well most of the time so I don't think I need to do it for you this time.

TOP

返回列表