返回列表 發帖
原帖由 shutterbug 於 2009-1-8 10:24 發表

Do you remember what Jesus did to the woman who commited adultery when people tried to kill her by throwing her stones?  You do your research well most of the time so I don't think I need to do it fo ...


well, that is written down in the older part of the bible
and u said that the came of Jesus wouldn't cancel any of those laws....

TOP

原帖由 chunsh 於 2009-1-8 10:29 發表


well, that is written down in the older part of the bible
and u said that the came of Jesus wouldn't cancel any of those laws....

My understanding might not be 100% correct but here is what I think...we're not trashing 律法, but Jesus salvation surpasses/more superior than 律法 and we're living under the "New Testement" era.  This is just a quick answer.  If you want very detailed notes, then PM me.

TOP

原帖由 shutterbug 於 2009-1-8 12:00 發表

My understanding might not be 100% correct but here is what I think...we're not trashing 律法, but Jesus salvation surpasses/more superior than 律法 and we're living under the "New Testement" era.  T ...

thanks, but its ok, I just want to point out, while the bible has so many confusion because of words to words, sentences to sentences translations, how can anyone be sure which teachings/translation from which churches is true from your god?

TOP

There's is the Bible, you can always go and study hard yourself.  That is the standard.  You should verify the stuff yourself even if the stuff is coming out from a Christian's mouth....that's the key and right attitude.  Really, anybody can say anything they want even Christians.  The reponsibility lies on you to confirm if what's being said matches the Bible.  If you don't verify, you might fall into the hole of "blind" believe too.

TOP

原帖由 chunsh 於 2009-1-8 10:29 發表


well, that is written down in the older part of the bible
and u said that the came of Jesus wouldn't cancel any of those laws....


Jesus never said to the crowd "the Law of Moses doesn't apply anymore, you people have no rights to stone her..."  Instead, Jesus said if any person in the crowd has never been sinned, that person may throw the first stone.

TOP

原帖由 mcjohnjohn 於 2009-1-8 07:03 發表


Ultraman, 我唔clarify lu, 盞徙氣. 嘻嘻~
Just want to point out that you always says rule, rule and rule.
I really don't think there is any rule. For me, 愛天主 & 愛人如己 is not a rule, it is my lif ...

I use the term "rule" all because of you used this word first! I rather prefer to use "teaching". (I thought I'm respecting your but actually..... sigh)

TOP

原帖由 mcjohnjohn 於 2009-1-8 08:03 發表


Ultraman, 我唔clarify lu, 盞徙氣. 嘻嘻~
Just want to point out that you always says rule, rule and rule.
I really don't think there is any rule. For me, 愛天主 & 愛人如己 is not a rule, it is my lif ...

u know what? 愛人如己 is just violating the laws of all living things (except for parents die for protecting their own off-springs)

why lie to yourself

TOP

原帖由 chunsh 於 2009-1-8 16:11 發表

u know what? 愛人如己 is just violating the laws of all living things (except for parents die for protecting their own off-springs)

why lie to yourself

I'd like to know why you say "愛人如己 is just violating the laws of all living things".  First, can you tell me what's the "laws of all living things"?  The term is very vague to me.

TOP

原帖由 shutterbug 於 2009-1-9 00:36 發表

Maybe I think you don't remember correctly...

『莫想我來要廢掉律法和先知。我來不是要廢掉,乃是要成全。我實在告訴你們,就是到天地都廢去了,律法的一點一畫也不能廢去,都要成全』(太5:17-18)

成全 = fulfil ...


我一向都覺得係用"愛天主, 同愛人如己"去"成全"舊法乍woh, 我覺得幾make sense架woh.
d 舊法唔work 啦, 比人扭曲哂, 耶穌基督基詭降生就係要同大家講新盟丫麻.

TOP

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-1-9 05:35 發表

I use the term "rule" all because of you used this word first! I rather prefer to use "teaching". (I thought I'm respecting your but actually..... sigh)


有d 咁既事? 多謝你既尊重~
不過, 我覺得呢d 唔係rule, 我亦都唔記得自己幾時講過, 可能小弟英文唔好, 多多包函~

TOP

返回列表